Historic True Crime

A guide to miscreants from ages past

  • Home
  • The Blog
  • Disclosure Statement
  • About
  • Donate

How Did George Reeves Die?

June 19, 2015 by Tonya Blust Leave a Comment

How Did George Reeves Die

Early in the morning of June 16, 1959, a gaggle of partygoers was boozing and chatting in the Los Angeles home of George Reeves, the 45-year-old actor best known for his portrayal of the Man of Steel in the popular television show “Adventures of Superman.” At some point between 1:30 and 2 a.m., Reeves’ guests heard the sound of a gunshot from an upstairs bedroom to which the actor had previously retired. According to partygoers, one of the guests raced upstairs to find Reeves lying across his bed, the life snuffed out of him by a bullet in the head.

Following an investigation, officers of the Los Angeles Police Department ruled the death a suicide, likely prompted by Reeves’ alleged depression over the fact that he was experiencing financial problems and that his career had stalled since the cancellation of “Superman” in 1958. Many students of the case accept the official finding; however, others insist that this version of events ignores too many questionable circumstances. Proponents of the latter point of view believe that Reeves was, at the very least, shot accidentally, or, at the worst, straight-up murdered.

The man who would eventually meet a much-debated end was born George Keefer Brewer in Iowa in 1914. Shortly after the boy’s birth, his parents divorced, and eventually George moved to California with his mother, Helen. It was there where he caught the proverbial “acting bug,” singing and performing in school plays throughout high school and college. Reeves picked up his first major film credit by portraying one of the “Tarleton Twins,” suitors of Scarlett O’Hara, in the 1939 blockbuster “Gone With the Wind.” The fledgling actor chose “Reeves” as his stage surname, and went on to appear in a number of B movies before snagging the role of Superman in the 1950s television series that made him famous. (Reeves also shed the cape and tights long enough to appear in the Academy Award-winning 1953 film “From Here to Eternity.”)

Reeves had hesitated to take on the role of Superman because he considered television a step down from film work. He did enjoy one aspect of the job, however—portraying America’s ideal role model. While in public, aware that kids were watching his every move, Reeves refrained from such un-Superman-like behavior as smoking cigarettes. Yet despite his affection for young fans, Reeves chafed at his low salary and rigid contract, which made movie work next to impossible. Reeves also feared that he would become typecast as a do-gooder and that producers wouldn’t accept him in meatier roles requiring more acting chops.

It was in the midst of this professional stress that Reeves’ private life began getting messy. In the early 1950s, he had started seeing a former Ziegfield Follies showgirl named Toni Mannix, who was married to Eddie Mannix, the general manager of MGM. Their relationship lasted several years, until early 1959, when Reeves broke up with Mannix. Shortly afterward, he became engaged to a socialite named Leonore Lemmon. Both women would factor into theories regarding Reeves’ death.

The events of that night remain shadowy, as the witnesses in Reeves’ home were intoxicated when police arrived. However, according to those in attendance, Reeves had gone to bed, then returned downstairs to complain about the noise his visitors were making. Reeves stayed long enough for a drink, then returned upstairs. Shortly afterward, his guests heard the gunshot that ended Reeves’ life and launched a number of conspiracy theories about his death.

One of the most common theories is that Toni Mannix, enraged at the fact that Reeves had broken up with her, arranged his murder with the help of thugs in the employ of her movie mogul husband, who apparently didn’t have a problem with Toni’s affair. Hollywood publicist Ed Lozzi claimed that, on Toni Mannix’s deathbed in the early 1980s, she confessed to a priest that she had been involved in Reeves’ death. However, no outside source can confirm Lozzi’s claim.

Still others believe that Lemmon killed Reeves, either accidentally or as a deliberate murder. Lemmon was known to have a fiery temper (she and Reeves had allegedly fought a few hours before his death) and was one of the guests at Reeves’ home on that fateful night. Supporters of this theory point to statements from Reeves’ friend (and fellow Tarleton Twin) Fred Crane, who wasn’t present when Reeves died, but who said that one of the witnesses had confided that Lemmon was upstairs—and not downstairs with the rest of the guests as she had claimed—at the time Reeves was shot. The fact that shortly after the death Lemmon fled to New York with $4,000 in traveler’s checks that Reeves had allegedly bought for their honeymoon added fuel to this theory.  However, as with the assertions surrounding Toni Mannix, those who insist that Lemmon was involved rely primarily on conjecture and circumstantial evidence. In the end, it’s likely no single solution to the mystery will satisfy its many “followers.”

Though Reeves may have felt unappreciated by the entertainment industry in life, Hollywood embraced him in death. He’s interred in Mountain View Cemetery and Mausoleum in Altadena, California, and received a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in 1960. In addition, the 2006 film “Hollywoodland,” starring Ben Affleck as Reeves, presents a fictionalized version of the events surrounding Reeves’ death.

Filed Under: Hollywood Crimes, True Crime Mysteries

The Bath School Disaster

May 19, 2015 by Tonya Blust Leave a Comment

The Bath School Disaster

Note: Portions of this post originally appeared in my blog, My Michigan, which details unique people, places, and events in the Great Lakes State.

——————–

America’s worst school-related mass murder took place on May 18, 1927 in the sleepy community of Bath, Michigan, located a few miles northeast of the state capital, Lansing.

The Bath School Disaster is a little-known event, having been pushed from national headlines a few days after it occurred by Charles Lindbergh’s historic transatlantic flight. However, it’s one of the nation’s most significant tragedies; 45 people (mostly children) lost their lives and another 58 were injured at the hands of a deranged local man, Andrew Kehoe, who bombed the school over slights he believed he had suffered at the hands of fellow community members.

Kehoe had purchased a farm in Bath in 1919 and quickly became a thorn in the sides of local leaders. He was an intelligent man, but impatient and frugal. One source of his ire was the Bath Consolidated School , which the community had built so that all the district’s students could attend a single school, rather than divide themselves among the one-room schoolhouses that dotted the area. Kehoe railed against the higher taxes the consolidated school required, but construction proceeded regardless, and the school opened in 1922.

Kehoe eventually served as treasurer of the consolidated school board, where his combative personality and penny-pinching ways made him a difficult person with whom to work. During this time, Kehoe suffered a series of financial and emotional setbacks; his wife was sick with tuberculosis, he couldn’t pay his bills, and, in 1926, his mortgage company announced the start of foreclosure proceedings on his farm. Many students of the disaster believe that Kehoe’s “last straw” was the fact that he lost a race for town clerk in 1926; it was after this supposed slight that he developed his plans to bomb the school.

Kehoe began stockpiling explosives, which he planted in the school’s basement under the guise that he was working on its lighting system. On May 18, 1927, a few days shy of graduation, Kehoe set his plan in motion. Sometime in the days before the bombing, he had killed his wife, Nellie. Around 8:45 a.m. on the 18th, Kehoe set off firebombs he had wired throughout his farm. (Nellie’s body would later be found there, in the charred remains of a chicken coop.) At almost the same time, an alarm clock set by Kehoe detonated the explosives he had planted under the school. The school’s north wing collapsed into a heap of rubble, taking its young occupants and their teachers with it.

Kehoe’s deadly work wasn’t done. As volunteers rushed between his farm and the school, trying to save whoever they could, Kehoe drove his truck, loaded with explosives and metal shrapnel, into town, and parked it near the school. He called to Superintendent Emory Huyck, with whom Kehoe had a fractious relationship. Huyck approached the truck. A witness later testified that he saw Kehoe and Huyck grapple over a gun that Kehoe had brought with him. Suddenly, the truck exploded, killing both Kehoe and Huyck, as well as three other people (including an eight-year-old boy). The blast injured several others.

By the time Kehoe was done wreaking his vengeance, 45 people (including Kehoe and his wife) had died, and 58 had been injured. More would surely have died but for the fact that the explosives Kehoe had wired under the school’s south wing did not detonate, possibly because of a short circuit caused by the first explosion.

While Bath struggled to recover, donations poured in from across the nation, including $75,000 from James J. Couzens, Michigan’s U.S. Senator. In 1928, the new James Couzens Agricultural School opened on the site of the consolidated school building, and served students until its demolition in 1975. The site now contains a memorial park, the centerpiece of which is a cupola that survived the school bombing. The cupola pays tribute to those who lost their lives in one of the deadliest tragedies in Michigan’s—and the nation’s—history.

Filed Under: True Crime Stories

Interview: Nathan Gorenstein, author of “Tommy Gun Winter”

May 11, 2015 by Tonya Blust Leave a Comment

Tommy Gun Winter

One of my most recent true crime reads was “Tommy Gun Winter” by Nathan Gorenstein. Subtitled, “Jewish Gangsters, a Preacher’s Daughter, and the Trial That Shocked 1930s Boston,” this book delivers on all the scandal its tagline promises, and then some.

It’s the story of the lethal but little-known Millen-Faber gang, which terrorized Depression-era Boston with a series of robberies and killings throughout 1933 and 1934. The gang’s crime spree culminated in a February holdup that led to the murder of two police officers in the Boston suburb of Needham. The offenders—brothers Murt and Irv Millen and their cohort Abe Faber—assumed that they were too smart for the cops to catch them. However, a car battery, of all things, set the police on their trail and ultimately led to the gang’s demise. Add to all this the fact that Murt Millen’s wife, Norma, was a minister’s daughter who might have known more about the crimes than she let on, and you’ve got the makings of a story that enthralled Boston residents throughout the dreariest years of the Depression.

“Tommy Gun Winter” is the type of historic true crime book I love: meticulously researched, yet told in an entertaining style that kept me turning the pages. With the amount of devastation the Millens and Faber wrought in such a short period of time, I was surprised that I had never heard of their exploits. However, “Tommy Gun Winter” (so-named after Murt Millen’s weapon of choice) did a great job of transporting me to the streets of 1930s Boston and introducing me to a real-life cast of characters who would almost be sympathetic if their deeds weren’t so vile. In “Tommy Gun Winter,” macho Murt, slow-witted Irv, arrogant Abe, and narcissistic Norma aren’t just one-dimensional villains, but fully fleshed-out human beings who, had the cards been stacked differently, might have led less notorious but more respectable lives.

Gorenstein, who is related to the Millen brothers, answered a few questions about his book exclusively for Historic True Crime. Read on to learn more about Gorenstein’s experience delving into an unsavory chapter of his family history. Also, be sure to check out his website, www.nathangorenstein.com.

Nathan Gorenstein

Nathan Gorenstein

When did you first learn of the Millen-Faber gang? 

I first heard of the “Millen-Faber gang” when I took three months off from work in 1998 to research what I originally thought was a single “bank robber” in the family. It turned out that the “ Millen” of the Millen-Faber gang were two brothers, Murton and Irving Millen, my first cousins twice removed. That makes my great-grandfather the brother of their father. Many of the older relatives I knew growing up were Murt and Irv’s contemporaries. One, in fact, had gone on double dates with Murt and the minister’s daughter who became his wife.

What made you decide to write a book about the Millen brothers, Norma Millen, and Abe Faber? 

I began my research after remarks at a family gathering sparked my interest. I quickly realized it was an extraordinary, if tragic, story about sons of a successful Boston contractor from the Jewish neighborhood of Roxbury, and their friend, an MIT graduate with a degree in aeronautical engineering who was also lieutenant in the US Army Reserves. That was Abe Faber. A beautiful 18-year-old minister’s daughter, two Boston newspaper reporters, and two extraordinary state police detectives. Then there was the trial, at the time the longest murder trial in state history, with 17 psychiatrists testifying for the defense or prosecution.

Can you talk a bit about your research process? What sources did you use? Were you able to contact individuals associated with the Millens and/or Faber?

The key resource was the transcript of the murder trial. It is 3,500 pages long. The Massachusetts judicial archive has a copy on microfilm, which I purchased (a paper version). Two other resources deserve equal attention. One is the historic newspaper archive at the Boston Public Library. The library has microfilm copies of just about every Boston newspaper ever published, dating back to the colonial era. In 1934, there were seven competing daily newspapers published in Boston, giving me a wealth of information. Much of it I then used to track down other sources. 

Then there were documents I obtained from the archives of the Massachusetts State Police. After a freedom of information request, I ultimately obtained investigative reports and letters written by the detectives who solved the case, the transcript of the only interrogation of the minister’s daughter, and a lengthy memo by one of two newspaper reporters who were credited with helping identify the bank robbers.

I was also able to meet a relative of Norma Brighton, Murt’s wife, and spoke with some Millen relatives.

What were some of the most surprising or noteworthy aspects of the story that you discovered?

The most unusual fact had to do with syphilis. Syphilitic insanity was used as a defense by the MIT grad, and while researching the disease I discovered that a German scientist, Julius Wagner-Jauregg, was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1927 for discovering that syphilis insanity could be treated by infecting the patient with malaria. The resulting high fever killed the syphilis bacteria in the patient’s blood, and the malaria could then be treated with quinine. I kid you not. He [Wagner-Jauregg] later joined the Nazi party.

What is your take on the main players (the Millen brothers, Norma, Abe) and their personalities/motivations?

Murton Millen, the leader of the gang, was a sociopath, a condition partially the result of his genes, partially the result of his upbringing at the hands of a violent father. Irv had below-normal intelligence, and Abe was in love with Murt. He [Abe] began participating in Murt’s hold-ups as a way to stay emotionally close to Murt after his [Murt’s] marriage to the minister’s daughter. It was also then that Murt started killing people. He had been staging robberies for a year prior to the first murder in December 1933. 

Norma Brighton Millen was the daughter of divorced parents. Headstrong and 18 years old, she clashed with her father over dating, dancing and boys. Murt, who met her at a beachfront dance hall, offered Norma a way out of the rural town where she lived.

In your opinion, why is the story of the Millen-Faber gang not better known?

Not sure. The Boston papers periodically revisit the crime on major anniversaries. It may be because no federal agency was ever involved, as was the case with [John] Dillinger or Pretty Boy Floyd, and no movie was ever made about the gang itself, as was the case with Bonnie and Clyde. There is a 1939 film with Henry Fonda, “Let Us Live,” that deals with a secondary story in the book.

What impact has the process of researching and writing this book had on you?

I had to learn how to write all over again. After years in journalism I knew how to write a newspaper story, but writing a book was completely different. Structure, detail, tone, authorial voice, etc. It was work, but a great education.

Are additional books in your future?

I’d like to do another book, but for the moment I’m scheduling book readings in Massachusetts and around Philadelphia, where I live nearby. 

Filed Under: True Crime Interviews

The Capital Case of Caryl Chessman

April 22, 2015 by Tonya Blust Leave a Comment

Caryl Chessman

Caryl Chessman spent 12 years on California’s death row protesting his 1948 conviction on 17 counts of robbery, kidnapping, and rape. Throughout his time as a ward of the state, Chessman wrote several books, letters, and essays claiming his innocence. He also filed a number of appeals, insisting that officials had not properly conducted his trial. Chessman’s tale of injustice was so compelling, it earned him eight stays of execution, as well as the support of public figures like author Norman Mailer, poet Robert Frost, former first lady Eleanor Roosevelt, and pastor Billy Graham, all of whom appealed for clemency on his behalf.

Despite Chessman’s very public efforts to avoid execution, his luck ultimately ran out and he entered the gas chamber in San Quentin Prison on May 2, 1960. Yet even the finality of that act seemed in doubt when a call came minutes later, delivering a message from a federal judge who had issued yet another stay of execution. However, prison officials insisted that the call had arrived too late and that they couldn’t open the chamber without endangering the lives of staff members. (Newspapers reported that the secretary who placed the call had misdialed during her first attempt, and that had her initial call gone through, it would have arrived before the execution began.) So it was that, after years of legal wrangling, 39-year-old Chessman met his long-delayed, yet somehow still premature, end.

The fact that Chessman spent most of his adult life behind bars probably didn’t surprise people who knew him as a teenager. Born Carol Whittier Chessman in St. Joseph, Michigan in 1921, Chessman (who later changed the spelling of his first name) moved to California with his family in 1922. As a teenager, he engaged in a series of petty crimes—mostly car thefts—that led to his incarceration in youth lockups. Then, as a member of the “Boy Bandit Gang,” he took part in robberies for which he received jail time in adult prisons. He was released in 1947.

The crimes that led to Chessman’s demise occurred shortly after that, in January 1948. A series of armed robberies in the greater Los Angeles area kept police on high alert, especially once the culprit began pulling over couples in cars, stealing their possessions, and sexually assaulting the female occupants. The so-called “Red Light Bandit” hadn’t murdered anyone, but the public feared what would happen if his crime spree continued.

Witness statements allowed police to issue an all-points bulletin for the mystery assailant. Within hours of the bulletin’s release, officers apprehended Chessman and an accomplice, David Knowles, in a car that had been used during a robbery earlier that month. A few days after his arrest, Chessman confessed to the Red Light Bandit’s crimes (though he later said that police had coerced the confession). At Chessman’s trial, he was found guilty of 17 of the 18 charges against him. Knowles was also found guilty, though because he faced fewer charges than Chessman, he avoided the death penalty. Knowles’ convictions were thrown out in 1950.

That Chessman faced the death penalty for a crime other than murder was an anomaly brought about by the existence of so-called “Little Lindbergh Laws,” which many states passed following the kidnapping and murder of 1-year-old Charles Lindbergh, Jr. in 1932. Under California law, kidnapping became a death-penalty offense if committed with the intent to do bodily harm. The fact that Chessman dragged women from their cars to assault them was considered just such an offense, and led to his execution. The Little Lindbergh Laws are no longer in effect.

In addition to his autobiography, “Cell 2455, Death Row,” Chessman’s story is the subject of several books, as well as a 1955 movie with the same title as his autobiography.

Filed Under: True Crime Stories

The Killer Love Story of Arthur Waite

April 15, 2015 by Tonya Blust Leave a Comment

Arthur Waite

Note: This post originally appeared in my blog, My Michigan, which details unique people, places, and events in the Great Lakes State.

——————–

It’s a typical love story, told in countless romance novels. A poor boy meets a rich girl and works tirelessly to elevate his social standing so that he can win her affection. The boy woos the girl, marries her, and spirits her away to a life of comfort and luxury in the big city. Then, when the girl’s parents come to visit the newlyweds in their posh new home, the boy kills them.

Okay, so the marriage of Arthur Warren Waite (the boy) and Clara Peck (the girl) was not a storybook romance, a fact with which Clara’s ill-fated parents, John and Hannah Peck, would likely agree. The sad saga of the Peck family began when Waite started dating Clara during high school, shortly after the turn of the 20th century. Waite came from a family of farmers, while Clara enjoyed a wealthy lifestyle made possible by the fortune her father had earned as co-founder of Peck Brothers Drug Company in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The lovebirds continued their romance after Waite left for The University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, where he studied dentistry, and later for postgraduate work at the University of Glasgow in Scotland, from which he graduated with honors. The newly minted physician found his way to South Africa, where he served as chief dentist for a mining company. However, Clara was never far from his thoughts and Waite eventually returned to Grand Rapids in 1914 to speed up their courtship.

Trouble was already brewing between Waite and his sweetheart’s family; John Peck disapproved of the relationship, insisting that Waite was too ambitious. However, his concerns fell on deaf ears, and Clara married Waite in Grand Rapids in September 1915. Perhaps as a peace offering, John gave the newlyweds an apartment in Manhattan, where Waite and Clara moved shortly after their marriage and where Waite set up a dental practice.

If Waite had been as diligent about maintaining his practice as he was about playing tennis and hooking up with married women, John and Hannah Peck might have lived the rest of their lives in peace. As it was, not long after arriving in New York City, Waite began an affair with a wealthy married woman, and realized that he needed money to keep his new honey satisfied. Though his in-laws gave him and Clara a monthly stipend, the amount wasn’t enough to please Waite. He hatched a plan to get his hands on the rest of the Pecks’ fortune, and put it into action in January 1916, when Hannah Peck arrived in New York to visit her daughter and son-in-law.

Hannah likely relished the chance to relax and catch up with her family while spending time in a fast-paced, cosmopolitan city. However, ten days after her arrival, she was dead, and her cremated remains sent back to Grand Rapids. Waite insisted on overseeing the cremation and funeral preparations so that the rest of the grieving family would be spared the task.

John Peck mourned his deceased wife, but was also grateful for the way Waite had taken charge of the situation. The eldest Peck decided a visit to his daughter and son-in-law was in order, and he arrived in New York City in March 1916. In an eerie coincidence, he, like his wife, died not long after. As he had done after Hannah’s death, Waite insisted that a quick cremation and return to Grand Rapids was in order. However, Clara and her brother, Percy, resisted, saying that their father was so well-known in his hometown that mourners would certainly want to see his body.

Not wanting to invite suspicion, Waite gave in, but his murderous plot was already unraveling. When Percy returned to Grand Rapids, he received a telegram from an unknown person, “K. Adams,” that urged him to have his father’s body examined. (It was later revealed that a Peck relative, Elizabeth Hardwicke, had sent the telegram after seeing Waite parade around New York City with his mistress.) Percy arranged for the exam, during which physicians discovered traces of arsenic and chloroform in his father’s body. Their conclusion was that John Peck and, in all probability, his wife Hannah, had been murdered.

At first, Clara insisted that her husband had nothing to do with her parents’ suspicious deaths, but the evidence quickly mounted against Waite. The man who embalmed John Peck told police that Waite offered him money to put arsenic in the embalming fluid, so that examiners would attribute the presence of that substance in John’s body to the embalmer’s work, and not to Waite’s deadly deeds. (Though the embalmer accepted the money, he never spiked the fluid with arsenic.) Police also found an atomizer that Waite had filled with typhoid and anthrax germs, and had then given to Clara when she caught a cold. (Clara refused to inhale from it, a decision that likely saved her from becoming the third Peck to die at the hands of Arthur Waite.)

The evidence against Waite was piling up, and Waite, seeing no way out, tried to kill himself with sleeping pills before finally confessing to the murders of John and Hannah Peck. Waite said he had dosed the couple with anthrax and typhoid strains that he had stolen from a hospital. While Hannah died right away, John hadn’t perished quickly enough for Waite, who eventually resorted to arsenic. When that still didn’t work, Waite smothered John to death with chloroform.

The reason for Waite’s crimes? Money, plain and simple. Waite had set his sights on the Peck fortune when he was just a kid, and everything he did afterward–courting Clara, graduating from The University of Michigan (through which he had cheated his way to a degree), and attending the University of Glasgow (where he forged papers stating that he had graduated from the institution)–moved Waite closer to that goal. The dentist admitted that he planned to kill everyone in the Peck family, so despite the fact that Clara and Percy Peck lost their parents to a deranged sociopath, they were also lucky in a sense, as they had escaped his murderous clutches.

Waite was tried and convicted for his crimes, and executed in the electric chair on May 1, 1917. John and Hannah Peck are buried in Oakhill Cemetery in Grand Rapids.

Filed Under: True Crime Stories

Beulah Annan, Jazz-Age Murderess

March 22, 2015 by Tonya Blust Leave a Comment

Beulah Annan

If you’ve seen the stage musical “Chicago” (or the 2002 film based on the musical), you know the story of Roxie Hart, a Jazz-Age temptress who goes on trial for murder in the titular city after she shoots her lover following a tryst. Roxie Hart may be fictional, but Beulah Annan, the woman on whom Roxie is based, was very real, and the tale told in “Chicago” adheres to her story pretty closely.

Annan was born Beulah May Sheriff in Owensboro, Kentucky in 1899. She had already been married and divorced once when, at age 20, she wed Al Annan (called “Amos Hart” in the musical) in 1920. The couple lived in Chicago and scraped by on the wages Al earned as a mechanic and the money Beulah brought in as a bookkeeper.

It was Beulah’s workplace, Tennant’s Model Laundry, where she met Harry Kalstedt, with whom she began an affair. In the musical, Kalstedt is known as “Fred Casely,” and he woos Roxie/Beulah with promises of securing her a spot on the vaudeville stage. In reality, Beulah wasn’t seeking show business stardom—perhaps just a diversion from the tedium of her life. In any event, the crime that unfolded in the musical mirrors the real-life incident. On April 3, 1924, Beulah and Harry began arguing in the Annans’ marital bedroom. Though her story changed a few times, Beulah ultimately claimed that, during the row, “they both reached for the gun” (remember that line from the musical?) that was sitting on the bed. When Beulah got to it first, she said, she shot Kalstedt in self-defense.

Less than two months later, in late May 1924, Beulah was acquitted by jurors who bought her story, despite the fact that one of her earlier explanations for the crime was that she had shot Kalstedt in a fit of jealousy after he threatened to leave her. A day after Beulah’s acquittal, Al Annan, who had stood by his wife throughout the trial and who had spent a significant amount of money on her defense, got the news that his wife was leaving him. “He is too slow,” Beulah explained.

After the trial, Beulah faded back into obscurity. She married and divorced once more, and ultimately ended up in a Chicago sanitarium, where she died of tuberculosis in 1928.

Filed Under: True Crime Stories

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Welcome

Tonya, your editress

Stay in touch

Facebook  Twitter  Pinterest  Blog Lovin'

Search

Categories

  • Hollywood Crimes
  • True Crime Interviews
  • True Crime Mysteries
  • True Crime Stories

Post Archives

Post Categories

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 · Wild on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in